Introduction:"Biographia
Literaria" by Samuel Taylor Coleridge is a great literary work. It has
occupied a permanent position in the whole rang of English criticism. Along
with some other important sides of poetry, where Coleridge shows the merits and
demerits of Wordsworth's poetry. It also shows his criticism of Wordsworth's
theory of poetic language. His discussion is philosophical. His arguments are
sound indeed.
Description: Wordsworth has
written "Preface to the Lyrical Ballads" alone. But he in
collaboration with Coleridge published Lyrical Ballads in 1798. Coleridge
perhaps does not want to take the responsibility of the theories expressed in
"Preface to the Lyrical Ballads". He feels necessary to defend
himself. So he has written his " Biographia Literaria " as a self- defense. However, he points out the defects of Wordsworth's criticism and
theory of poetic language. Three statements made by Wordsworth in his
"Preface to the Lyrical Ballads" lead Coleridge to criticizes and
object him. They are choice of rustic theme, rustic language and same language
for both prose and poetry.
Wordsworth chooses rustic theme for
his poetry. He argues that in this condition of life, the essential passions of
the heart find a better soil in which they can attain their maturuty. He says
that rustic theme is more emphatic than others. He directly attacks the
conventional tradition of the language of poetry. To him, language for poetry
should be the language really spoken by rustic people. By denying the
contemporary literary theory, he has adopted the language of humble and rustic
people. He has chosen this language because the humble people live in close
relationship with nature. He says that their language is more passionate, more
vivid and more forceful.
The Neo-classical poets suggest that
the language of poetry is different from the language of prose. The language of
poetry must be highly ornamental. But, according to Wordsworth, there is no
difference between the language of prose and poetry. In this respect, he says
-----
"There
neither is, nor can be, any essential difference between the language of prose
and metrical composition."
Wordsworth believes that poetry sheds
on tears such as angels weep. But it will shed natural and human tears.
Coleridge criticizes Wordsworth's views on the theme of poetry. He says that
rustic theme cannot bring the real theme of poetry. In some of his poems, he
cannot choose the rustic themes. According to him, when Wordsworth chooses the
rustic theme, he becomes like a rustic man. He talks about the rustic language
really spoken by men. He wants to use the word, 'ordinary' for 'real'.
Coleridge objects Wordsworth's views of rustic language. He says that if the
poet wishes to use rustic language available, he must also think like the
rustics. Thus he must go narrow his generous creative faculty: Coleridge criticizes Wordsworth's theory of poetic language to a great extent. He says
that poetry is a metrical composition. It must have its difference with prose.
The language of prose and poetry cannot be identical. Coleridge believes that
there must be an essential difference between the language of prose and poetry.
In order to drive home the point, he cites a number of poems. He observes that
the language of poetry must be selected and there must a proper arrangement of
words. It is true that the words both for prose and poetry may be the same. But
their arrangement is positively different. This difference results from metre
which is essential for a poem. According to Coleridge, poetry is the metrical
composition of imagination and feeling.
Conclusion: To sum up, we can
say that Coleridge might have requested Wordsworth to write a preface for their
volume of poetry, Lyrical Ballads. He then found that his collaborator had
expressed the views which he could not agree. He was not likely to take the
charge of Wordsworth's views on the different aspects of poetry. So he decides
to write "Biographia Literaria" to give a suitable reply. Coleridge criticizes Wordsworth's theory of poetic language. He finds out its merit and
demerits.
0 Comments