John
Dryden’s present essay “An essay on Dramatic Poesy” gives an explicit account
of neo-classical theory of art in general. He defends the classical drama
standing on the line of Aristotle saying it is an imitation of life, and
reflects human nature clearly. He also discusses the three unities, rules that
require a play take place in one place, during one day, and that it develops
one single action or plot. The essay is written in the form of dialogue
concerned to four gentlemen: Eugenius, Crites, Lisideius and Neander. Neander
seems to speak for Dryden himself. Eugenius takes the side of the modern
English dramatists by criticizing the faults of the classical playwright, who
did not themselves observe the unity of place. But Crites defended the ancient
and pointed out that they invited the principles of dramatic art enunciated by
Aristotle and Horace. Crites opposed to rhyme in plays and argues that through
the moderns excel in science; the ancient age was the true age of poetry.
Lesideius defends the French playwrights and attacks the English tendency to
mix genres. He defines a play as a just and lively image of human and the
change of fortune to which it is subject for the delight and instruction of
mankind. Neander favours the moderns, respects the ancients, critical to rigid
rules of dramas and he favours rhyme if it is in proper place like in grand
subject matter. Neander a spokesperson of Dryden argues that tragic comedy is
the best form for a play; because it is the closest to life in which emotions
are heightened by both mirth and sadness. He also finds subplots as an integral
part to enrich a play. He finds the French drama, with its single action. Neander
favors the violation of the unities because it leads to the variety to the
English plays. The unities have a narrowing and crumpling effect on the French
plays, which are often betrayed in to absurdities from which the English plays
are free. The violation of unities helps the English play Wright to present a
mere, just and lively image of human nature. In his comparison of French and
English drama, Neander characterizes the best proofs of the Elizabethan
playwrights. He praises Shakespeare ancients and moderns.Neander comes to the
end for the superiority of the Elizabethans with a close examination of a play
by Johnson which Neander believes a perfect demonstration that the English were
capable of following classical rules. In this way, Dryden’s commitment to the
neoclassical tradition is displayed. Dryden rebukes against the critics, who
attack the use of rhyme both in tragedy and comedy. Since nobody speaks in
rhyme in real life, he supports the use of blank verse in drama and says that
the use of rhyme is serious plays is justifiable than the blank verse.
0 Comments